The new bomber like B-2 an estimated $510 million per aircraft costhelmet怎么读

The American new bomber resembles the B-2, which is expected to cost 510 million dollars each. The original title: the new American bomber resembles the B-2 and is expected to cost 510 million dollars per frame. The air force released the shape picture of the new strategic bomber on 26 March and named it B-21. The bomber with flying wing shape, black body painting, like active type B-2 stealth strategic bomber. The former name of the B-21 project was "long-range strike bomber", which was asked by the US air force to take off from the United States and hit targets anywhere in the world within hours. Named B-21, it was the first bomber developed by the United States after its entry into the twenty-first Century. The U.S. Air Force will be collecting B-21 nicknames in the army, and is scheduled to be released this fall. There are 3 models of the active bomber in the US air force, namely B-52, B-1 and B-2. B-52 has been in service for more than half a century, and B-1 is expected to retire in 40s this century. The U.S. Army plans to purchase up to 100 B-21, replacing B-52 and B-1. The first flight is expected to B-21 during the period from 2020 to 2030. The air force expects the price of each rack to be $510 million. Some analysts predict that the total cost of B-21 R & D projects will reach $80 billion. Xinhua editor in chief: Liu Debin SN222 statement: Sina published this article for the purpose of transmitting more information, does not mean to agree with its views or to confirm its description.

美国新型轰炸机酷似B-2 预计每架造价5.1亿美元   原标题:美新型轰炸机酷似B-2 预计每架造价5.1亿美元   美国空军26日发布新型战略轰炸机的外形图片,并命名它为B-21型。该轰炸机采用飞翼造型,全身黑色涂装,酷似现役B-2型隐身战略轰炸机。   B-21项目先前的名称是“远程打击轰炸机”,美国空军要求它能从美国本土起飞,在数小时内打击全球任何一个地方的目标。取名为B-21,体现它是美国进入21世纪后研制的首款轰炸机。美国空军将在军中征集B-21的绰号,预计今年秋季选定并公布。   美国空军现役战略轰炸机共有3个型号,即B-52、B-1和B-2。其中B-52服役已超过半个世纪,B-1预计本世纪40年代退役。美军打算采购最多100架B-21,替换B-52和B-1。首架B-21预计2020年至2030年期间试飞。空军预计,每架的价格将为5.1亿美元。一些分析师预计,B-21研发项目总耗资将达800亿美元。 新华 责任编辑:刘德宾 SN222 声明:新浪网登载此文出于传递更多信息之目的,并不意味着赞同其观点或证实其描述。相关的主题文章: